Pillar 2’s innovation problem how GLOBE threatens IP regimes by Oliver Wehnert and Alexander Kunkel
By: Wehnert, Oliver
.
Contributor(s): Kunkel, Alexander
.
Material type: 





Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-B/2021/101/1-4 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-B/2021/101/1-4 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-B/2021/101/13-3 Mexico's undertaxed payment rule and its interplay with FDII, GILTI, and subpart F | OP 138-B/2021/101/13-4 Analyze this | OP 138-B/2021/101/13-5 Transfer pricing in Nigeria | OP 138-B/2021/101/1-4 Pillar 2’s innovation problem | OP 138-B/2021/101/1-5 Global sellers and marketplaces must prepare for U.K. post-Brexit VAT changes | OP 138-B/2021/101/2-1 U.S. tax review | OP 138-B/2021/101/2-2 Procedural due process and international information reporting |
Disponible también en formato electrónico.
Resumen.
In this article, the authors consider how the pillar 2 blueprint could hurt intellectual property regimes, including regimes that comply with action 5, and they offer potential solutions to align minimum taxation and
substance-based IP regimes.
There are no comments for this item.