A general income inclusion rule as a tool for improving the international tax regime challenges arising from EU primary law Peter Koerver Schmidt
By: Schmidt, Peter
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2020/11-4 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2020/11-4 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141/2020/11-10 The Apple case | OP 2141/2020/11-2 New taxing right in the Unified Approach: old wine in a new bottle | OP 2141/2020/11-3 The future of OECD tax arbitration | OP 2141/2020/11-4 A general income inclusion rule as a tool for improving the international tax regime | OP 2141/2020/11-5 Group transactions, transfer pricing and litigation | OP 2141/2020/11-6 Procedures of the Polish tax authorities and the VAT gap | OP 2141/2020/11-7 Inheritance tax and foreign spouses in Turkey |
Resumen.
The overall concept of the OECD's Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Proposal is to develop a coordinated set of rules to address ongoing risks from profit shifting and to curb international tax competition. Two important components of the proposal are the income inclusion rule and the switch-over rule and, in this article, these components are examined in consideration of EU primary law. Depending on the final design of the rules, it is concluded that the proposed income inclusion rule - however, probably not the switch-over rule - may end up restricting the fundamental freedoms by treating comparable situations differently. Against that background, a number of policy options for designing the income inclusion rule in accordance with primary EU law requirements are presented, and pros and cons of these design options are discussed.
There are no comments for this item.