A commentary on the ECJ's decision in the Dutch Köln-Aktienfonds Deka case and what goes beyond electrónico R.P.C. Adema
By: Adema, R. P. C.
Material type: ArticlePublisher: 2020Subject(s): FONDOS DE INVERSION | NO RESIDENTES | DIVIDENDOS | IMPUESTOS | RETENCIONES TRIBUTARIAS | PAISES BAJOS | TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS | JURISPRUDENCIA In: Finance and Capital Markets v. 22, n. 3, December 2020, 12 p. Summary: This article deals extensively with the Köln-Aktienfonds Deka case on the eligibility of non-resident investment funds to a refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax (DWHT). It places this procedure in the Dutch context and explains the similarities with the Fidelity Funds case.Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | FCM/2020/3-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | FCM/2020/3-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
Disponible únicamente en formato electrónico.
Resumen.
This article deals extensively with the Köln-Aktienfonds Deka case on the eligibility of non-resident investment funds to a refund of Dutch dividend withholding tax (DWHT). It places this procedure in the Dutch context and explains the similarities with the Fidelity Funds case.
There are no comments for this item.