The "carried interest" rules of Section 1061 proposed regulations resolve several ambiguities under the statut Ronald E. Creamer, Zachary W. Feldman, Andrew B. Motten, David C. Spitzer, Davis J. Wang, and Isaac Wheeler
Contributor(s): Creamer, Ronald E
.
Material type: 





Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 235/2020/1-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 235/2020/1-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 235/2020/1 Journal of Taxation of Investments | OP 235/2020/1-1 Taxation as a barrier to blockchain innovation | OP 235/2020/1-2 Market reactions to IBOR transition proposed tax regulations | OP 235/2020/1-3 The "carried interest" rules of Section 1061 | OP 235/2020/1-4 Tax considerations for funds structuring in Asia | OP 235/2020/1-5 A note on Public Pension Plan Funding | OP 235/2020/1-6 The proposed Section 1031 regulations after the TCJA |
Disponible también en formato electrónico.
Resumen.
The recently released proposed regulations under Code Section 1061 are a mixed bag for taxpayers. Certain aspects of Section 1061 are interpreted narrowly, but the proposed regulations are broad in other respects. And the proposed regulations provide detailed—and in some cases very complex—rules on how taxpayers should calculate the amount of long-term capital gain recharacterized as short-term capital gain under Section 1061 and the application of certain exceptions. Affected taxpayers, particularly hedge funds and private equity industries, and their advisors should closely review the proposed regulations.
There are no comments for this item.