Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Rethinking interquartile ranges Finn Martensen Electrónico

By: Martensen, Finn.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2020Subject(s): PRECIOS DE TRANSFERENCIA | EVALUACION | ANÁLISIS ESTADÍSTICO | METODOLOGÍA In: International Transfer Pricing Journal v. 27, n. 1, January 2020, p. 42-46Summary: The interquartile range has become the international de facto standard for transfer pricing benchmarking studies. However, it is not a statistically robust method to trim a range of values. Instead of quartiles, confidence intervals of quartiles should be applied. This approach is in line with OECD TP guidance, and furthermore provides a clear criterion for an often neglected aspect of OECD TP guidance: that benchmark ranges should only be narrowed in the case of a sizeable number of observations. The author suggests that the full range should always be used for sets of less than 27 comparables. The suggested methodology can be easily implemented using standard spreadsheet software.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Disponible únicamente en formato electrónico.

Resumen.

The interquartile range has become the international de facto standard for transfer pricing benchmarking studies. However, it is not a statistically robust method to trim a range of values. Instead of quartiles, confidence intervals of quartiles should be applied. This approach is in line with OECD TP guidance, and furthermore provides a clear criterion for an often neglected aspect of OECD TP guidance: that benchmark ranges should only be narrowed in the case of a sizeable number of observations. The author suggests that the full range should always be used for sets of less than 27 comparables. The suggested methodology can be easily implemented using standard spreadsheet software.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha