Unnecessary and yet harmful some critical remarks to the OECD Note on the impact of the COVID-19 Crisis on tax treaties Andrés Báez Moreno
By: Báez Moreno, Andrés
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2020Subject(s): CORONAVIRUS | POLITICA FISCAL | ORGANIZACION DE COOPERACION Y DESARROLLO ECONOMICO
In:
Intertax volume 48, issues 8-9, August-September 2020, p. 814-830Summary: The COVID-19 pandemic has restricted freedom of movement and imposed forced, or at least unplanned, displacement. Insofar as the International Tax Regime continues to be based on the physical presence of individuals, this has led to unexpected and often undesirable tax consequences. The reaction of the OECD Secretariat to this situation has been to issue a note claiming, in essence, that everything remains the same. This article critically approaches that note by exposing its general methodological flaws and analysing each of the four specific aspects to which it refers: Permanent Establishments (PEs), Place of Effective Management (POEM), Cross-Border Workers and Residence of Individuals.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2020/48-16 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2020/48-16 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 2141/2020/4-7 International corporate tax regime post-BEPS | OP 2141/2020/4-8 Regulatory framework for tax incentives in developing countries after BEPS Action 5 | OP 2141/2020/48-13 COVID-19 and US Tax Policy | OP 2141/2020/48-16 Unnecessary and yet harmful | OP 2141/2020/6/7 Intertax | OP 2141/2020/6/7-1 Covid-19 | OP 2141/2020/6/7-2 What is international double taxation? |
Bibliografía
The COVID-19 pandemic has restricted freedom of movement and imposed forced, or at least unplanned, displacement. Insofar as the International Tax Regime continues to be based on the physical presence of individuals, this has led to unexpected and often undesirable tax consequences. The reaction of the OECD Secretariat to this situation has been to issue a note claiming, in essence, that everything remains the same. This article critically approaches that note by exposing its general methodological flaws and analysing each of the four specific aspects to which it refers: Permanent Establishments (PEs), Place of Effective Management (POEM), Cross-Border Workers and Residence of Individuals.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.