Tax abuse and legal pluralism towards concrete solutions leading to coordination between international tax treaty law and EU tax law Carla De Pietro
By: De Pietro, Carla
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141-B/2020/2-4 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141-B/2020/2-4 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141-B/2020/2-1 Article 116 TFEU | OP 2141-B/2020/2-2 Cross border qualification problems between social security and supplementary pension | OP 2141-B/2020/2-3 Some thoughts to understand the Court of Justice recent case-law in the Danmark cases on tax abuse | OP 2141-B/2020/2-4 Tax abuse and legal pluralism | OP 2141-B/2020/2-5 Does the European Union primary law require member states to make corresponding adjustments? | OP 2141B/2020/29/4-2 EU fiscal state aid rules and COVID-19 | OP 2141B/2020/29/4-3 Evaluation of the earnings stripping rules |
Resumen.
This article concerns the concept of tax abuse adopted by EU and OECD. The author analyses both the notion of abuse contained in Article 7 (1) of the MLI and the EU notion of abuse as developed by the EU Court of Justice. This analysis shows the existence of discrepancies between these two notions. Furthermore, the article takes into consideration the consequences of this lack of coordination between international tax treaty law and EU tax law.
There are no comments for this item.