Fiscal rules, bailouts, and reputation in federal governments Alessandro Dovis and Rishabh Kirpalani
By: Dovis, Alessandro
.
Contributor(s): Kirpalani, Rishabh
.
Material type: 


Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 234/2020/3-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 234/2020/3-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 234/2020/12 The American Economic Review | OP 234/2020/2 The American Economic Review | OP 234/2020/3 The American Economic Review | OP 234/2020/3-1 Fiscal rules, bailouts, and reputation in federal governments | OP 234/2020/4 The American Economic Review | OP 234/2020/5 The American Economic Review | OP 234/2020/5 (Congreso anual) The American Economic Review |
Bibliografía
Expectations of transfers by central governments incentivize overborrowing by local governments. In this paper, we ask if fiscal rules can reduce overborrowing if central governments cannot commit. We study a model in which the central government’s type is unknown and show that fiscal rules increase overborrowing if the central government’s reputation is low. In contrast, fiscal rules are effective in lowering debt if the central government’s reputation is high. Even when the central government’s reputation is low, binding fiscal rules will arise in the equilibrium of a signaling game.
There are no comments for this item.