Zakat Islam's missed opportunity to limit predatory taxation Timur Kuran
By: Kuran, Timur
.
Material type: 



Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | URL | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 1443/2020/182/3/4-2 (Browse shelf) | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-019-00663-x | Available | OP 1443/2020/182/3/4-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 1443/2020/182/1/2 Public Choice | OP 1443/2020/182/3/4 Public Choice | OP 1443/2020/182/3/4-1 Predatory state | OP 1443/2020/182/3/4-2 Zakat | OP 1443/2020/183/1/2 Public Choice | OP 1443/2020/183/3/4 Public Choice | OP 1443/2020/183/3/4-1 James M. Buchanan Centennial Birthday Academic Conference |
Disponible también en formato electrónico
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
One of Islam’s five canonical pillars is a predictable, fixed, and mildly progressive tax system called zakat. It was meant to finance various causes typical of a pre-modern government. Implicit in the entire transfer system was personal property rights as well as constraints on government—two key elements of a liberal order. Those features could have provided the starting point for broadening political liberties under a state with explicitly restricted functions. Instead, just a few decades after the rise of Islam, zakat opened the door to arbitrary political rule and material insecurity. A major reason is that the Quran does not make explicit the underlying principles of governance. It simply outlines the specifics of zakat as they related to conditions in seventh-century Arabia.
There are no comments for this item.