Local government fiscal health comparing self - assessments to conventional measures Stephanie Leiser and Sarah Mills
By: Leiser, Stephanie
.
Contributor(s): Mills, Sarah
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 1716/2019/3-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1716/2019/3-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 1716/2019/3 Public Budgeting and Finance | OP 1716/2019/3-1 Does the cost - cutting strategy of closing public schools provide financial benefits? | OP 1716/2019/3-2 The efficiency - equity tradeoff in school aid | OP 1716/2019/3-3 Local government fiscal health | OP 1716/2020/1 Public Budgeting and Finance | OP 1716/2020/1-1 Looking forward to cuts | OP 1716/2020/1-2 Assessing the financial impact of natural disasters on local governments |
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
Municipal fiscal condition is typically assessed using objective financial indicators, but little is understood about how local officials subjectively evaluate their own fiscal health. Using both qualitative and quantitative approaches to analyze survey data from Michigan, we explore how local officials conceptualize fiscal health and compare self-assessments with conventional financial indicators. The results reveal that local officials emphasize long-run issues and external stressors, but the relative importance of different factors varies depending on whether they report high or low fiscal stress. We suggest that self-assessments may be a useful supplement to conventional objective measures in capturing "true" fiscal health.
There are no comments for this item.