Party cues, political trends and fiscal interactions in the United States J. Sebastian Leguizamon and Casto Martin Montero Kuscevic
By: Leguizamon, J. Sebastian
.
Contributor(s): Montero Kuscevic, Casto Martin
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 1634/2019/4-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1634/2019/4-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 1634/2019/3 Contemporary Economic Policy | OP 1634/2019/3-1 Who pays no tax ? | OP 1634/2019/4 Contemporary Economic Policy | OP 1634/2019/4-1 Party cues, political trends and fiscal interactions in the United States | OP 1634/2019/4-2 The size of fiscal multipliers and the stance of monetary policy in developing economies | OP 1634/2019/4-3 Pension contributions, pension awareness and changing personal finances | OP 1634/2020/1 Contemporary Economic Policy |
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
Recent theoretical and empirical research has suggested that similarities in party affiliations across space will alter voters' comparisons, thus influencing fiscal policy mimicking. We employ a two‐regime spatial panel data model applied to U.S. state governors from 1970 to 2012, and find rather weak empirical evidence of influence of political party affiliations in fiscal yardstick competition. Our observed cross‐state interdependence in fiscal policies suggests voters may not weigh party affiliation heavily in their measure of comparative quality, treating each incumbent individually and independently. Incumbents strategically choose policy accordingly. This provides indirect support for the median voter theorem, in which incumbents' objective function is to maximize votes, independent of political affiliation.
There are no comments for this item.