Tariff incidence evidence from U.S. sugar duties 1890 - 1914 Douglas A. Irwin
By: Irwin, Douglas A
.
Material type: 







Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 233/2019/3-5 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 233/2019/3-5 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 233/2019/3-2 The effects of required minimun distribution rules on withdrawals from traditional IRAs | OP 233/2019/3-3 Rules versus home rule | OP 233/2019/3-4 Firm take-up of a corporate income tax cut | OP 233/2019/3-5 Tariff incidence | OP 233/2019/3-6 Earned income tax credits and infant health | OP 233/2019/4 National Tax Journal | OP 233/2019/4-1 The geometry of international tax planning after the tax cuts and jobs act |
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
Do domestic consumers or foreign exporters bear the burden of a tariff on imports? This paper uses a unique set of high-frequency (weekly/daily) data on the landed and the duty-inclusive price of raw sugar in New York City from 1890 to 1914 to help provide an answer. Tariff reductions are immediately passed through to consumer prices, but only about 40 percent of tariff increases are passed through. The apparent explanation is the asymmetric response of demand: imports collapse upon a tariff increase but fail to surge after a tariff reduction.
There are no comments for this item.