Firm take-up of a corporate income tax cut evidence from Vietnam Anh Pham
By: Pham, Anh
.
Material type: 







Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 233/2019/3-4 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 233/2019/3-4 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 233/2019/3-1 Deterring property tax delinquency in Philadelphia | OP 233/2019/3-2 The effects of required minimun distribution rules on withdrawals from traditional IRAs | OP 233/2019/3-3 Rules versus home rule | OP 233/2019/3-4 Firm take-up of a corporate income tax cut | OP 233/2019/3-5 Tariff incidence | OP 233/2019/3-6 Earned income tax credits and infant health | OP 233/2019/4 National Tax Journal |
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
This paper examines whether and why a sizable portion of eligible firms in Vietnam did not claim a 30-percent temporary corporate income tax reduction, part of a stimulus package to boost the economy during the Global Financial Crisis. Using census firm-level panel data supplemented with survey data collected for this study, I find that only 40–60 percent of eligible firms claimed the tax cut. This low take-up rate is surprising in the context of under-reporting behavior in which businesses try in many ways to reduce their tax liability. Using a difference-in-differences approach with firm-level fixed effects, I find that nonclaiming firms were either not aware of the policy or were afraid of a tax audit. The government’s policy may have boosted the economy by more had more firms known they could qualify for a tax cut.
There are no comments for this item.