Domestic tax arbitration some economic considerations Nuno Garoupa
By: Garoupa, Nuno
.
Material type: 





Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2019/8/9-10 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2019/8/9-10 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141/2019/6/7-9 Three emblematic measures in Portuguese business taxation | OP 2141/2019/8/9 Intertax | OP 2141/2019/8/9-1 Special issue on arbitration | OP 2141/2019/8/9-10 Domestic tax arbitration | OP 2141/2019/8/9-11 The federal income tax goes to war | OP 2141/2019/8/9-12 Implemetation of the controlled foreign company rules in the Netherlands | OP 2141/2019/8/9-13 Do sale and lease back transactions require a VAT adjustment ? |
Resumen.
In this article, the author discusses the economic arguments for and against domestic tax arbitration. Beyond the standard benefits and costs widely discussed by the literature on private arbitration, he emphasizes two additional concerns: agency costs (because there is a significant principal-agent problem within the government) and fast lane effect (less public investment in improving tax courts).
There are no comments for this item.