How does Luxembourg's new permanent establishment provision affect tax treaties ? by Matthijs Haarsma
By: Haarsma, Matthijs
.
Material type: 



Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 138-Bis/2019/95/3-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 138-Bis/2019/95/3-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 138-Bis/2019/95/2-3 Transfer pricing and the right to use intangibles in Nigeria | OP 138-Bis/2019/95/3 Tax Notes International | OP 138-Bis/2019/95/3-1 Who's afraid of deemed repatriations? | OP 138-Bis/2019/95/3-2 How does Luxembourg's new permanent establishment provision affect tax treaties ? | OP 138-Bis/2019/95/3-3 Going the way of the Polaroid | OP 138-Bis/2019/95/3-4 Has the United States really moved to a territorial system, or is ti false advertising? | OP 138-Bis/2019/95/4 Tax Notes International |
Disponible también en formato electrónico en la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
In this article, the author discusses recent changes to the definition of a permanent establishment under Luxembourg's domestic tax law and considers whether the changes may amount to a tax treaty override.
There are no comments for this item.