A finale incomparabile to the saga of definitive losses ? Deduction of foreign losses and fundamental freedoms after Bevola and Sofina Roland Ismer & Harald Kandel
By: Ismer, Roland
.
Contributor(s): Kandel, Harald.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2019Subject(s): PERDIDAS | RENTAS EXTRANJERAS | IMPUESTOS | RESIDENCIA FISCAL | DERECHOS HUMANOS | UNION EUROPEA | JURISPRUDENCIA
In:
Intertax v. 47, Issue 6/7, June / July 2019, p. 573-589Summary: The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has developed a rich case law on the impact of the fundamental freedoms on the need for deducting foreign losses. The article analyses the CJEU's case law both with respect to loss relief in the residence and in the non-residence state and shows that the case law is consistent. Such losses only need to be taken into account in the residence state when they are comparable to domestic losses and to the extent definitiveness implies the source state cannot fulfil its primary responsibility to grant loss relief. The recent decisions in Bevola on loss relief in the residence state and Sofina in the source state fit into the Court's line of reasoning
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2019/6/7-4 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2019/6/7-4 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
Resumen.
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has developed a rich case law on the impact of the fundamental freedoms on the need for deducting foreign losses. The article analyses the CJEU's case law both with respect to loss relief in the residence and in the non-residence state and shows that the case law is consistent. Such losses only need to be taken into account in the residence state when they are comparable to domestic losses and to the extent definitiveness implies the source state cannot fulfil its primary responsibility to grant loss relief. The recent decisions in Bevola on loss relief in the residence state and Sofina in the source state fit into the Court's line of reasoning
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.