Debt push-downs in times of BEPS Action 4 and the ATAD G. F. Boulogne
By: Boulogne, G. F
.
Material type: 








Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2019/5-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2019/5-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141/2019/5 Intertax | OP 2141/2019/5-1 Developments on the digital economy front | OP 2141/2019/5-2 Spiritus Ex Machina | OP 2141/2019/5-3 Debt push-downs in times of BEPS Action 4 and the ATAD | OP 2141/2019/5-4 The EU standard of good governance in tax matters for Third (non-EU) countries | OP 2141/2019/5-5 Open versus closed competence to tax | OP 2141/2019/6/7 Intertax |
Resumen.
Debt push-downs are a common feature of mergers and acquisitions transactions. This article addresses a key concern raised by debt-push downs: the decrease in the target company's taxable income (through the interest deduction) is often not paired with any increase in taxable income. Given this concern, the article discusses the Dutch approach of discouraging debt push-downs, whereby a specific measure was abolished on 1 January 2019 in light of the implementation in Dutch law of the earnings stripping measure contained in the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD); a rule that reflects the BEPS Action 4 recommendations. The author examines more general questions: (1) How do debt push-downs fit within the policy notions underlying BEPS Action 4? (2) Does the new earnings-based approach take away the concerns raised by them? (3) Does the ATAD require Member States to take action against debt push-downs? The article concludes with an outlook on the ability of multinational corporations to push down debt in current times.
There are no comments for this item.