Permanent establishments and BEPS Action 7 perspectives in evolution Carlo Garbarino
By: Garbarino, Carlo
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2019Subject(s): ESTABLECIMIENTO PERMANENTE | EROSIÓN DE LA BASE IMPONIBLE Y TRASLADO DE BENEFICIOS | PROGRAMAS | ORGANIZACION DE COOPERACION Y DESARROLLO ECONOMICO | ELUSION FISCAL
In:
Intertax v. 47, n. 4, April 2019, p. 365-381Summary: This article concerns changes of the definition of permanent establishment in the OECD Model Tax Convention due to the application of the proposals of the BEPS Action 7 - Preventing the Artificial Avoidance of Permanent Establishment Status. The author suggests that the judicial reasoning adopted within judicial trends developed at national level has been used in shaping evolving perspectives about the concept of permanent establishment adopted in the OECD Model. The article strives to achieve fuller comprehension of the issues raised by the Commentary in 2017, addresses different perspectives which can be adopted about preparatory/auxiliary activities that might prove useful in understanding the anti-fragmentation rule introduced in Article 5(4.1) of the OECD Model and then focuses on the concept of the agency permanent establishment 'PE' in light of the functional analysis developed by the OECD, with particular attention to the concrete use of the concept of 'authority to conclude contracts' within the functional approach now adopted by the OECD Model, particularly with regard to commissionaire structures.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2019/4-4 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2019/4-4 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
Resumen.
This article concerns changes of the definition of permanent establishment in the OECD Model Tax Convention due to the application of the proposals of the BEPS Action 7 - Preventing the Artificial Avoidance of Permanent Establishment Status. The author suggests that the judicial reasoning adopted within judicial trends developed at national level has been used in shaping evolving perspectives about the concept of permanent establishment adopted in the OECD Model. The article strives to achieve fuller comprehension of the issues raised by the Commentary in 2017, addresses different perspectives which can be adopted about preparatory/auxiliary activities that might prove useful in understanding the anti-fragmentation rule introduced in Article 5(4.1) of the OECD Model and then focuses on the concept of the agency permanent establishment 'PE' in light of the functional analysis developed by the OECD, with particular attention to the concrete use of the concept of 'authority to conclude contracts' within the functional approach now adopted by the OECD Model, particularly with regard to commissionaire structures.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.