Proposed regulations provide guidance on significant aspects of BEAT but some questions remain unanswered David P. Hariton ... [et al.]
Contributor(s): Hariton, David P
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2019Subject(s): EROSIÓN DE LA BASE IMPONIBLE Y TRASLADO DE BENEFICIOS | PREVENCIÓN | ESTADOS UNIDOSOnline resources: Click here to access online
In:
Journal of Taxation of Investments v. 36, n. 3, Spring 2019, p. 3-29Summary: The comprehensive tax reform legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 added Section 59A to the Internal Revenue Code, which imposes the “base erosion and anti-abuse tax” (BEAT) on certain taxpayers making “base eroding” payments to foreign related parties. On December 13, 2018, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service released proposed regulations on BEAT, which, if adopted, would clarify some of the key questions unanswered by the statutory language. The proposals, however, also include a number of surprises and do not provide specific rules on other issues that could have a critical impact on a taxpayer’s ultimate BEAT liability. This article discusses some of the most important issues that were addressed (and not addressed) by the proposed regulations.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 235/2019/3-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 235/2019/3-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
Disponible también en formato electrónico en la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
The comprehensive tax reform legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 added Section 59A to the Internal Revenue Code, which imposes the “base erosion and anti-abuse tax” (BEAT) on certain taxpayers making “base eroding” payments to foreign related parties. On December 13, 2018, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service released proposed regulations on BEAT, which, if adopted, would clarify some of the key questions unanswered by the statutory language. The proposals, however, also include a number of surprises and do not provide specific rules on other issues that could have a critical impact on a taxpayer’s ultimate BEAT liability. This article discusses some of the most important issues that were addressed (and not addressed) by the proposed regulations.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.