Video gambling adoption and tax revenues evidence from Illinois Saied Toossi and Pengju Zhang
By: Toossi, Saied
.
Contributor(s): Zhang, Pengju
.
Material type: 





Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | URL | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 1716/2019/1-3 (Browse shelf) | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/pbaf.12211 | Available | OP 1716/2019/1-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 1716/2019/1 Public Budgeting and Finance | OP 1716/2019/1-1 Budgeting for mandatory spending | OP 1716/2019/1-2 Does participatory budgeting change the share of public funding to low income neighborhoods ? | OP 1716/2019/1-3 Video gambling adoption and tax revenues | OP 1716/2019/2 Public Budgeting and Finance | OP 1716/2019/2-1 Property tax exemptions for nonprofit hospitals | OP 1716/2019/2-2 Can centralized performance budgeting systems be useful for line ministries? |
Disponible también en formato electrónico en la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
Illinois legalized video gambling in 2009 but afforded municipalities the option of allowing or prohibiting it within their jurisdictions. Using municipal-level data, this paper seeks to shed light on the underlying factors influencing this decision process and, conditional on adoption, the primary drivers of video gambling tax revenues. The analysis suggests that political and moral considerations, rather than fiscal needs or defensive legalization, underpin the decision to adopt. Conditional on adoption, the exposure to and prevalence of video gambling is associated with greater tax revenues. Video gambling also appears to be a substitute for casino gambling, leading
to some intra-industry cannibalization.
There are no comments for this item.