Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The constitutional challange to the new tariffs on steel and aluminium imports Jonathan L. Entin

By: Entin, Jonathan L.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2019Subject(s): IMPORTACION | ARANCELES | INCONSTITUCIONALIDAD | ESTADOS UNIDOSOnline resources: Click here to access online In: Journal of Taxation of Investments v. 36, n. 2, Winter 2019, p. 45-60Summary: Before one frets about the tax owed on investment profits there must be some profits. Tariffs can reduce or eliminate some taxpayers’ profits. Some parties alleging injury from President Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum have filed suit claiming that the statute on which the chief executive relied in imposing those tariffs is unconstitutional. This article assesses the challengers’ prospects for success in claiming that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act represents an impermissible delegation of legislative power to the chief executive. Although the lawsuit probably will fail, the plaintiffs’ arguments are not frivolous and might help to persuade Congress to reassert its constitutional power to regulate commerce with foreign nations.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Artículos IEF
IEF
OP 235/2019/2-4 (Browse shelf) Available OP 235/2019/2-4

Disponible también en formato electrónico en la Biblioteca del IEF.

Resumen.

Before one frets about the tax owed on investment profits there must be some profits. Tariffs can reduce or eliminate some taxpayers’ profits. Some parties alleging injury from President Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum have filed suit claiming that the statute on which the chief executive relied in imposing those tariffs is unconstitutional. This article assesses the challengers’ prospects for success in claiming that Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act represents an impermissible delegation of legislative power to the chief executive. Although the lawsuit probably will fail, the plaintiffs’ arguments are not frivolous and might help to persuade Congress to reassert its constitutional power to regulate commerce with foreign nations.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha