Hybrid entity mismatches exploring three alternatives for coordination Leopoldo Parada
By: Parada, Leopoldo
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2019Subject(s): INSTRUMENTOS HÍBRIDOS FINANCIEROS | FISCALIDAD INTERNACIONAL | ARMONIZACION FISCAL | ORGANIZACION DE COOPERACION Y DESARROLLO ECONOMICO
In:
Intertax v. 47, Issue 1, January 2019, p. 24-54Summary: The article discusses OECD pragmatic approach regarding hybrid entity mismatches. It argues for coordination in the tax characterization of entities as a straightforward and suitable alternative to replace the current OECD linking rules, and perhaps also, the consequentialist OECD approach to hybrid entity mismatches. For this purpose, three specific alternatives are explored for coordination in the tax characterization of entities, which include (1) supremacy of the tax characterization rules of the source state, (2) supremacy of the tax characterization rules of the residence state and (3) supremacy of the tax characterization rules of the home state. The analysis of these alternatives includes both hypotheticals and specific examples from domestic and supranational laws that are used to illustrate and support their effectiveness. The author demonstrates that coordination in the tax characterization of entities appears to be not only a more preferable path when compared to the OECD approach of matching tax outcomes, but also a more coherent and less costly alternative for both taxpayers and tax administrations.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2019/1-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2019/1-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
The article discusses OECD pragmatic approach regarding hybrid entity mismatches. It argues for coordination in the tax characterization of entities as a straightforward and suitable alternative to replace the current OECD linking rules, and perhaps also, the consequentialist OECD approach to hybrid entity mismatches. For this purpose, three specific alternatives are explored for coordination in the tax characterization of entities, which include (1) supremacy of the tax characterization rules of the source state, (2) supremacy of the tax characterization rules of the residence state and (3) supremacy of the tax characterization rules of the home state. The analysis of these alternatives includes both hypotheticals and specific examples from domestic and supranational laws that are used to illustrate and support their effectiveness. The author demonstrates that coordination in the tax characterization of entities appears to be not only a more preferable path when compared to the OECD approach of matching tax outcomes, but also a more coherent and less costly alternative for both taxpayers and tax administrations.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.