The new face of international tax dispute resolution : comparing the OECD Multilateral Instrument with the EU Dispute Resolution Directive Sriram Govind
By: Govind, Sriram
.
Material type: 





Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141-B/2018/6-4 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141-B/2018/6-4 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141-B/2018/6-1 The State aid selectivity-test in corporate tax matters | OP 2141-B/2018/6-2 VAT and Brexit | OP 2141-B/2018/6-3 The Court of Justice EU pulls down Dutch interest limitation rule | OP 2141-B/2018/6-4 The new face of international tax dispute resolution | OP 2141-B/2018/6-5 The reflection of data-driven value creation in the 2018 OECD and EU proposals | OP 2141-B/2018/6-6 New perspectives on fiscal State aid | OP 2141-B/2019/1 EC Tax Review |
Resumen.
With the recent focus on BEPS and digital taxation, it is expected that the number of disputes in the coming decade will grow. In order to counteract this, both the OECD and the EU have introduced new dispute resolution measures through the MLI and the Dispute Resolution Directive respectively. Although the provisions in these instruments may appear to have similar structures at first glance, they vary greatly in terms of scope and procedure. In fact, taxpayers will soon be facing questions as to which procedure to apply and how they relate to each other and interact. Accordingly, this article compares the dispute resolution provisions in both instruments so as to point out similarities, differences and the consequences thereof.
There are no comments for this item.