Mandating health insurance coverage for high - income individuals Paul D. Jacobs
By: Jacobs, Paul D
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 233/2018/4-11 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 233/2018/4-11 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 233/2018/4 National Tax Journal | OP 233/2018/4-1 The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act | OP 233/2018/4-10 Missing the mark | OP 233/2018/4-11 Mandating health insurance coverage for high - income individuals | OP 233/2018/4-2 A preliminary assessment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 | OP 233/2018/4-3 Income - based effective tax rates and choice - of - entity considerations under the 2017 Tax Act | OP 233/2018/4-4 Tax policy and organizational form |
Disponible también en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
I seek to untangle the effect of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA’s) individual mandate for health coverage by focusing on higher-income non-elderly adults and exploiting state differences in the rules governing premium setting and coverage issuance in the non-group market prior to 2014. Using the American Community Survey (ACS) from 2012 through 2016, the individual mandate penalties were associated with 7–12 percentage points of the 13-percentage-point increase in coverage for higher-income adults in the non-group market (a 19–30 percent reduction in uninsurance).
There are no comments for this item.