Taxes and US oil production : evidence from California and windfall profit tax by Nirupama L. Rao
By: Rao, Nirupama
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2135/2018/4-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2135/2018/4-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2135/2018/4 American Economic Journal : Economic Policy | OP 2135/2018/4-1 Can small incentives have large effects? | OP 2135/2018/4-2 The welfare impact of second-best uniform-Pigouvian taxation | OP 2135/2018/4-3 Taxes and US oil production | OP 2135/2019/1 American Economic Journal : Economic Policy | OP 2135/2019/1-1 Who really benefits from consumption tax cuts ? | OP 2135/2019/1-2 Effectiveness of fiscal incentives for R&D |
Disponible también en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
The recent boom in US oil production has prompted debates on
levying new taxes on oil. This paper uses new well-level production data and price variation from federal oil taxes and price controls to assess how taxes affected production. After-tax price elasticity estimates range between 0.295 (0.038) and 0.371 (0.025). Response along the shut-in margin is minimal. There is no evidence of spatial shifting of production to minimize tax liabilities. Taken together, the results suggest that taxes reduced domestic production in the 1980s, and the response largely came from wells that continued to pump oil, but at a reduced rate.
There are no comments for this item.