Four state challenge the cap on SALT deductions Erik M. Jensen
By: Jensen, Erik M
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 235/2018/36/1-6 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 235/2018/36/1-6 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 235/2018/36/1-3 Tax adventures in litigation land | OP 235/2018/36/1-4 Planning options for charitable giving under the new tax law | OP 235/2018/36/1-5 New incentivized investment | OP 235/2018/36/1-6 Four state challenge the cap on SALT deductions | OP 235/2018/36/1-7 Strategies for the new base erosion and anti-abuse tax | OP 235/2018/4 Journal of Taxation of Investments | OP 235/2018/4-1 miscellaneous itemized deductions may be missed more than expected |
Disponible también en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
The attorneys general of New York, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Maryland have fi led a complaint in New York v. Mnuchin, challenging the constitutionality of the $10,000 cap on the deduction for state and local taxes established the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017. This article considers the most important of the states’ claims and concludes that none of them is convincing.
There are no comments for this item.