An initial "Keynesian illness"? : Friedman on taxation and the inflationary gap
By: Levrero, Enrico Sergio
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2018Subject(s): FRIEDMAN, MILTON | PENSAMIENTO FISCAL | IMPUESTOS | INFLACION | GASTO PUBLICOOnline resources: Click here to access online
In:
Cambridge Journal of Economics v. 42, n. 5, September 2018, p. 1219-1237Summary: This paper examines Friedman’s writings in the years 1941–43 and compares them with those after the war with a view to assessing differences and similarities. Albeit a first assessment, Friedman’s claim that he was suffering from a ‘Keynesian illness’
in his ‘Washington phase’ appears to have been less ‘serious’ and deep than he himself feared, although he was to some extent influenced by the ‘prevailing Keynesian temper of the time’.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 1352/2018/5-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1352/2018/5-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 1352/2018/4-2 Sraffa on taxable income and its implications for fiscal policy | OP 1352/2018/42-2 Wheels within wheels within wheels | OP 1352/2018/5 Cambridge Journal of Economics | OP 1352/2018/5-1 An initial "Keynesian illness"? | OP 1352/2018/5-2 Debt cycles, unstability and fiscal rules | OP 1352/2018/6 Cambridge Journal of Economics | OP 1352/2018/6-1 The dynamics of industrial and economic renewal in mature economies |
Disponible también en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
This paper examines Friedman’s writings in the years 1941–43 and compares them with those after the war with a view to assessing differences and similarities. Albeit a first assessment, Friedman’s claim that he was suffering from a ‘Keynesian illness’
in his ‘Washington phase’ appears to have been less ‘serious’ and deep than he himself feared, although he was to some extent influenced by the ‘prevailing Keynesian temper of the time’.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.