Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Public tax-return disclosure Jeffrey L. Hoopes, Leslie Robinson, Joel Slemrod

By: Hoopes, Jeffrey L.
Contributor(s): Robinson, Leslie A | Slemrod, Joel B.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2018Subject(s): IMPUESTO DE SOCIEDADES | AUSTRALIA | INFORMACION TRIBUTARIAOnline resources: Click here to access online In: Journal of Accounting and Economics v. 66, Issue 1, August 2018, p. 142-162Summary: We investigate the consequences of public disclosure of information from company income tax returns filed in Australia. Supporters of more disclosure argue that increased transparency will improve tax compliance, while opponents argue that it will divulge sensitive information that is, in many cases, misunderstood. Our results show that in Australia large private companies experienced some consumer backlash and, perhaps partly in anticipation, some acted to avoid disclosure. We detect a small increase (decrease) in tax payments for private (public) firms subject to disclosure suggesting differential costs of disclosure across firms. Finally, we find that investors react negatively to anticipated and actual disclosure of tax information, most likely due to anticipated policy backlash rather than consumer backlash or the revelation of negative information about cash flows. These findings are important for both managers and policy makers, as the trend towards increased tax disclosure continues to rise globally.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Disponíble únicamente en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.

Resumen.

Bibliografía.

We investigate the consequences of public disclosure of information from company income tax returns filed in Australia. Supporters of more disclosure argue that increased transparency will improve tax compliance, while opponents argue that it will divulge sensitive information that is, in many cases, misunderstood. Our results show that in Australia large private companies experienced some consumer backlash and, perhaps partly in anticipation, some acted to avoid disclosure. We detect a small increase (decrease) in tax payments for private (public) firms subject to disclosure suggesting differential costs of disclosure across firms. Finally, we find that investors react negatively to anticipated and actual disclosure of tax information, most likely due to anticipated policy backlash rather than consumer backlash or the revelation of negative information
about cash flows. These findings are important for both managers and policy makers, as the trend towards increased tax disclosure continues to rise globally.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha