McBEPS the MLI : the first Multilateral Tax Treaty that has never been Yariv Brauner
By: Brauner, Yariv
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2018Subject(s): EROSIÓN DE LA BASE IMPONIBLE Y TRASLADO DE BENEFICIOS | EVASION FISCAL | ELUSION FISCAL | PREVENCIÓN | PROGRAMAS | APLICACION | CONVENIO MULTILATERAL | TRATADOS INTERNACIONALES | FISCALIDAD INTERNACIONAL
In:
Intertax v. 46, n. 1, January 2018, 6-17Summary: The article argues that the multilateral instrument (MLI) was primarily devised to preserve the conservative evolution of the international tax regime, based on bilateral tax treaties, reciprocity and competition, and not as a multilateral tax treaty based on which a new coordinative regime shall arise. The article makes the point, however, that despite this main purpose the mere conclusion of the MLI introduces ambivalence into the international tax regime, breaking with its orthodoxy in a meaningful, even if not yet significant manner. The author makes fifteen observations on the MLI in its current status to substantiate this argument.
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 2141/2018/1-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2018/1-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 2141/2018/10-2 A package deal is not a bad deal | OP 2141/2018/10-3 The new tie-breaker-rule for companies according BEPS Action Point 6 | OP 2141/2018/10-4 The dual system of OECD Model Tax Conventions from the evolutionary perspective | OP 2141/2018/1-1 McBEPS | OP 2141/2018/11 Intertax | OP 2141/2018/11-1 Profit splitting and the aspirational arm's length standard | OP 2141/2018/11-2 Revisiting the fiscal and social security status of highly mobile workers in the road and railway transportation |
The article argues that the multilateral instrument (MLI) was primarily devised to preserve the conservative evolution of the international tax regime, based on bilateral tax treaties, reciprocity and competition, and not as a multilateral tax treaty based on which a new coordinative regime shall arise. The article makes the point, however, that despite this main purpose the mere conclusion of the MLI introduces ambivalence into the international tax regime, breaking with its orthodoxy in a meaningful, even if not yet significant manner. The author makes fifteen observations on the MLI in its current status to substantiate this argument.
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.