Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Conditional tax competition in American states Vincent Arel-Bundock, Srinivas Parinandi

By: Arel Bundock, Vincent.
Contributor(s): Parinandi, Srinivas.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2018Subject(s): POLITICA FISCAL | FEDERALISMO FISCAL | ARMONIZACION FISCAL | COMPETENCIA FISCAL NOCIVA | EMPRESAS | LOCALIZACION | ESTADOS UNIDOSOnline resources: Click here to access online In: Journal of Public Policy v. 38, Issue 2, June 2018, p. 191-220Summary: Cross-border commercial activity raises issues in federations where multiple jurisdictions can claim the right to tax the same income. In the United States, this coordination problem is resolved by splitting the tax base according to the geographic distribution of firms’ sales, capital and labour. The weight of each factor is determined on a state-by-state basis, which opens room for competitive legislative behaviour. In this complex issue area, however, policymakers must invest lot of resources to monitor competitors, evaluate policy alternatives and shepherd tax reform through the legislative process. This implies that highly professional legislatures should be more responsive to the policies of nearby states. We consider data on most American states over the period from 1986 to 2013 and find strong evidence of conditional spatial dependence. Our findings suggest that policy diffusion may often be moderated by institutional and political factors.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Call number Status Date due Barcode
Artículos IEF
IEF
OP 1793/2018/2-2 (Browse shelf) Available OP 1793/2018/2-2

Disponible en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.

Resumen.

Bibliografía.

Cross-border commercial activity raises issues in federations where multiple jurisdictions can claim the right to tax the same income. In the United States, this coordination problem is resolved by splitting the tax base according to the geographic distribution of firms’ sales, capital and labour. The weight of each
factor is determined on a state-by-state basis, which opens room for competitive legislative behaviour. In this complex issue area, however, policymakers must invest lot of resources to monitor competitors, evaluate policy alternatives and shepherd tax reform through the legislative process. This implies that highly
professional legislatures should be more responsive to the policies of nearby states. We consider data on most American states over the period from 1986 to 2013 and find strong evidence of conditional spatial dependence. Our findings suggest that policy diffusion may often be moderated by institutional and political factors.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Click on an image to view it in the image viewer

Powered by Koha