Normal view MARC view ISBD view

How to value a painting properly for estate tax purposes Estate of Kollsman v. Commissioner Kevin A. Diehl

By: Diehl, Kevin A.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2018Subject(s): ARTE | VALORACIONES FISCALES | IMPUESTOS | JURISPRUDENCIAOnline resources: Click here to access online In: Journal of Taxation of Investments n. 2, Winter 2018, p. 61-65Summary: Estate tax situations can involve difficult valuation issues, especially if the property in question lacks a readily ascertainable value. In particular, paintings that are not auctioned can be among the most challenging items to value. Many factors influence painting valuation, including the depiction’s popularity; condition, dimensions, and provenance (literature citation); and degree of direct artist participation. In addition, cleaning risks, bowing, and attribution disputes can result in discounts to what would otherwise be the fair market value. A recent case, Estate of Kollsman v. Commissioner, provides valuation guidance.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Disponible en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.

Resumen.

Estate tax situations can involve difficult valuation issues, especially if the property in question lacks a readily ascertainable
value. In particular, paintings that are not auctioned can be
among the most challenging items to value. Many factors influence painting valuation, including the depiction’s popularity;
condition, dimensions, and provenance (literature citation); and
degree of direct artist participation. In addition, cleaning risks,
bowing, and attribution disputes can result in discounts to what
would otherwise be the fair market value. A recent case, Estate of Kollsman v. Commissioner, provides valuation guidance.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha