How to value a painting properly for estate tax purposes Estate of Kollsman v. Commissioner Kevin A. Diehl
By: Diehl, Kevin A
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Artículos | IEF | IEF | OP 235/2018/2-7 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 235/2018/2-7 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 235/2018/2-4 Bitcoin loans and other crytocurrency tax problems | OP 235/2018/2-5 Taxation of bobbleheads and other sports promotional items | OP 235/2018/2-6 Update on Section 1043 | OP 235/2018/2-7 How to value a painting properly for estate tax purposes | OP 235/2018/3 Journal of Taxation of Investments | OP 235/2018/3-1 The new tax whipsaw for swaps | OP 235/2018/3-2 Is capping the deduction for state and local taxes unconstitutional ? |
Disponible en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
Estate tax situations can involve difficult valuation issues, especially if the property in question lacks a readily ascertainable
value. In particular, paintings that are not auctioned can be
among the most challenging items to value. Many factors influence painting valuation, including the depiction’s popularity;
condition, dimensions, and provenance (literature citation); and
degree of direct artist participation. In addition, cleaning risks,
bowing, and attribution disputes can result in discounts to what
would otherwise be the fair market value. A recent case, Estate of Kollsman v. Commissioner, provides valuation guidance.
There are no comments for this item.