Criminal tax cases sentences Courts don't have to like and opportunities for advocacy by Marla S. Carew and Eric M. Nemeth
By: Carew, Marla S
.
Contributor(s): Nemeth, Eric M.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2009Subject(s): DELITO FISCAL | JURISPRUDENCIA | ESTADOS UNIDOS | COMENTARIOS
In:
Journal of taxation v. 111, n. 2, August 2009, p. 109-115
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEF | OP 1695/2009/111/2-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1695/2009/111/2-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 1695/2009/111/1-1 Courts debate practitioner privilege and the scope of the tax shelter exception | OP 1695/2009/111/1-2 No " bliss " in New Phoenix Sunrise | OP 1695/2009/111/2-1 Alternative valuation | OP 1695/2009/111/2-2 Criminal tax cases | OP 1695/2009/111/5 Tax effects of decanting | OP 1695/2010/112/2-1 The impossible has happened | OP 1695/2010/112/2-2 Hedging transactions for mineral product prices excluded from percentagedepletion computations |
Resumen. Conclusión.
There are no comments for this item.