The implications of the judgment in the D case the perspective of two non - believers Arnaud de Graaf, Geert Janssen
By: Graaf, Arnaud de
.
Contributor(s): Janssen, Geert.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2005Subject(s): IMPUESTOS | DOBLE IMPOSICION | PREFERENCIAS ARANCELARIAS | INCENTIVOS FISCALES | RESIDENCIA FISCAL | MOVIMIENTO DE CAPITALES | TRATADOS INTERNACIONALES | PAISES BAJOS | TRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS | JURISPRUDENCIA | COMENTARIOS
In:
EC Tax Review v. 14, n. 4, 2005, p. 173-189
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEF | OP 2141-B/2005/4-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141-B/2005/4-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 2141-B/2005/3-2 The Merger Directive amended | OP 2141-B/2005/3-3 Capital movements and direct taxation | OP 2141-B/2005/3-4 Do the basic freedoms of the EC Treaty also require an amendment to the national tax law on charities and non - profit organisations ? | OP 2141-B/2005/4-1 The implications of the judgment in the D case | OP 2141-B/2005/4-2 The ECJ, the " D " case, double tax conventions and most - favoured nations | OP 2141-B/2005/4-3 EU policy for lifting pension tax obstacles does not work | OP 2141-B/2005/4-4 Cohesion |
There are no comments for this item.