Deduction or capital expenditure ? the mystery behind the treatment ofremoval costs by Rodney P. Mock and Jeffrey M. Tolin
By: Mock, Rodney P.
Contributor(s): Tolin, Jeffrey M.
Material type: ArticlePublisher: 2012Subject(s): AMPLIACION DE CAPITAL | IMPUESTOS | DEDUCCIONES | ESTADOS UNIDOS In: Journal of taxation v. 116, n. 4, April 2012, p. 183-192Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF | OP 1695/2012/116/4-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1695/2012/116/4-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 1695/2012/116/3-2 New " signing date " COI Regs. | OP 1695/2012/116/3-3 The new penalty standard | OP 1695/2012/116/3-4 Nonsimultaneous foreign rollovers may defer U.S. and foreign tax simultaneously | OP 1695/2012/116/4-1 Deduction or capital expenditure ? | OP 1695/2012/116/4-2 In Estate of Duncan, the Rax Court returns to traditional Graegin loan principles | OP 1695/2012/116/4-3 Foreing account reporting using form 8938 | OP 1695/2012/116/4-4 Second circuits sinks Castle Harbour ( again ) |
Resumen. Conclusión.
There are no comments for this item.