On a World Climate Assembly and the social cost of carbon by Martin L.Weitzman
By: Weitzman, Martin
.
Material type: 







Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF | OP 283/2017/336-1 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 283/2017/336-1 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 283/2016/330-2 Why can modern governments tax so much ? | OP 283/2016/330-3 The impact of Government debt, expenditure and taxes on aggregate investment and productivity growth | OP 283/2017/334 Special issue on inequality | OP 283/2017/336-1 On a World Climate Assembly and the social cost of carbon | OP 283/2017/336-2 Fiscal policy and inflation in a Monetary Unión | OP 283/2018/338 Economica | OP 283/2018/339 Economica |
Disponible en línea a través de la Biblioteca del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Conclusión. Apéndice. Bibliografía.
This paper argues that a uniform global tax-like price on carbon emissions, whose revenues each country retains, can provide a focal point for a reciprocal common climate commitment, whereas quantity targets, which do not nearly so readily present such a single focal point, tend to rely ultimately on individual quantity commitments. The paper postulates the conceptually useful allegory of a futuristic .World Climate Assembly. (WCA) that votes for a single worldwide price on carbon emissions via the basicdemocratic principle of one person,one vote majority rule. A WCA-like uniform price-tax counters selfinterest by incentivizing countries or agents to internalize the externality because each WCAagent.s higher abatement cost from a higher emissions price is counterbalanced by that agent.s extra benefit from inducing all other WCA agents to simultaneously lower their emissions in response to the higher price. Thepaper derives fresh insights and new simple formulae that relate each emitter.s most-preferred world Price of carbon to the world .social cost of carbon. (SCC), and further relates the WCA-voted world price ofcarbon to the world SCC. Some implications arediscussed. The overall methodology of the paper is a mixture of mostly classical with some behavioural economics.
There are no comments for this item.