Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Cheaper, greener and more efficient rationalising UK carbon prices Arun Advani and George Stoye

By: Advani, Arun.
Contributor(s): Stoye, George.
Material type: ArticleArticlePublisher: 2017Subject(s): POLITICA ENERGETICA | CARBON | CONTAMINACION ATMOSFERICA | REDUCCION | IMPUESTOS | PRECIOS | REINO UNIDO In: Fiscal Studies v. 38, n. 2, June 2017, p. 269-299Summary: Current UK energy use policies, which primarily aim to reduce carbón emissions, provide abatement incentives that vary by user and fuel, creating inefficiency. Distributional concerns are often given as a justification for thelower carbon price faced by households, but there is little rationale for carbonprices associated with the use of gas to be lower than those for electricity.We consider reforms that raise carbon prices faced by households and reduce the variation in carbon prices across gas and electricity use, improving the efficiency of emissions reduction. We show that the revenue raised from thesereforms can be recycled in a way that ameliorates some of the distributionalconcerns. Whilst such recycling is not able to protect all poorer households, existing policy also makes distributional trade-offs, but does so in an opaque and inefficient way.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Disponible en formato electrónico a través de la Biblioteca del IEF. Resumen. Conclusión. Bibliografía.

Current UK energy use policies, which primarily aim to reduce carbón emissions, provide abatement incentives that vary by user and fuel, creating inefficiency. Distributional concerns are often given as a justification for thelower carbon price faced by households, but there is little rationale for carbonprices associated with the use of gas to be lower than those for electricity.We consider reforms that raise carbon prices faced by households and reduce the variation in carbon prices across gas and electricity use, improving the efficiency of emissions reduction. We show that the revenue raised from thesereforms can be recycled in a way that ameliorates some of the distributionalconcerns. Whilst such recycling is not able to protect all poorer households, existing policy also makes distributional trade-offs, but does so in an opaque and inefficient way.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Powered by Koha