The European Commission's application of the state aid rules to tax where are we now ? Andrew Thomson and Emma Hardwick
By: Thomson, Andrew
.
Contributor(s): Hardwick, Emma
.
Material type: 






Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF | OP 235/2017/34/3-2 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 235/2017/34/3-2 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 235/2016/33/4-3 Capital assets | OP 235/2016/33/4-4 The financial transaction tax | OP 235/2017/34/3-1 Apple's tax debacle in Ireland | OP 235/2017/34/3-2 The European Commission's application of the state aid rules to tax | OP 235/2017/34/3-3 Treasury's passive activity interest abuse of power | OP 235/2017/34/4-1 New regulations raise critical issues concerning a partner's share of liabilities and partnership disguised sales | OP 235/2017/34/4-2 Estate of McKelvey v. Commissioner |
Disponible también en línea a través de la Biblioteca del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Resumen. Conclusión.
The E.U. concept of state aid is being applied by the European Commission to challenge tax rulings granted by E.U. Member States. Any ruling that derogates from domestic tax rules or, in the case of transfer pricing or the attribution of profits, from the arm.s length principle, may be challenged. Recent cases and decisions show that the Commission is arguably developing and applyingits own arm.s length principle when assessing whether tax rulings constitute unlawful state aid. This approach has garnered criticism, including from the U.S. Treasury Department and the Senate Finance Committee. Multinationals should review any existing tax rulings in light of the Commission.s new and evolving approach.
There are no comments for this item.