Legitimate and illegitimate tax planning two recent cases show the way by Richard M. Lipton
By: Lipton, Richard M
.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2012Subject(s): PLANIFICACION FISCAL | ESTADOS UNIDOS | JURISPRUDENCIA | COMENTARIOS | ELUSION FISCAL
In:
Journal of taxation v. 117, n. 4, October 2012, p. 207-212
| Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEF | OP 1695/2012/117/4-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 1695/2012/117/4-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
| No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
| OP 1695/2012/117/3-2 Untangling the constructive ownership rules for foreign entity information returns | OP 1695/2012/117/4-1 New portability Temp. Regs. ease burden on small estates, offer planningfor large ones | OP 1695/2012/117/4-2 New regulations on splitter arrangements | OP 1695/2012/117/4-3 Legitimate and illegitimate tax planning | OP 1695/2012/117/6-1 The de minimis expensing option under the Section 263 Temporary Regulations | OP 1695/2012/117/6-2 Historic Boardwalk Hall | OP 1695/2013/118/1-1 Proposed regulations radically overhaul " Tax Opinion " and other rules in Circular 230 |
Resumen. Conclusión.
There are no comments for this item.