Subcontracting services to a company and a permanent establishment according to article 5 paragraph 3 letter b) UN Model Convention Giai - Mau Ma
By: Ma, Giai Mau
.
Material type: 




Item type | Current location | Home library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEF | OP 2141/2017/6/7-3 (Browse shelf) | Available | OP 2141/2017/6/7-3 |
Browsing IEF Shelves Close shelf browser
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OP 2141/2017/5-7 Singapore | OP 2141/2017/6/7-1 GAARs and treaties : from the guiding principle to the principal purpose test | OP 2141/2017/6/7-2 Protection of the taxpayer in the information exchange procedure | OP 2141/2017/6/7-3 Subcontracting services to a company and a permanent establishment according to article 5 paragraph 3 letter b) UN Model Convention | OP 2141/2017/6/7-4 Taxation of digital economy | OP 2141/2017/6/7-5 Holding companies in the BEPS era | OP 2141/2017/6/7-6 Changing the paradigm of shipping activities' taxation in Portugal |
Accesible también en línea a través de la Biblioteca del Instituto deEstudios Fiscales. Conclusión. Resumen.
This articles examines the question whether subcontracting anothercompany can amount to a Permanent Establishment (PE) according to Article 5 paragraph 3 letter b) UN-Model-Conventions. In doing this, it looks at alternative service-PE-clauses, decisions and regulations in other jurisdictions and the interrelationship with the PE-profit-allocation-clause and the non-discrimination-clause. It argues that a PE through subcontracting another company would lead to dissatisfactory results.
There are no comments for this item.