Rowlingson, Karen

Public attitudes to a wealth tax the importance of "capacity to pay" electrónico / Karen Rowlingson, Amrita Sood,Trinh Tu


Resumen.
Disponible en el en formato electrónico en el Repositorio de la Biblioteca del IEF.

In this paper, we present findings from the first ever study, to our knowledge, to focus in detail on public attitudes to an annual wealth tax. We start with a brief review of relevant recent studies before outlining the mixed methods used, which involved a nationally representative survey of 2,243 members of the general public and four focus groups conducted during the summer of 2020. The study aimed to measure, explore and explain the overall levels of support for a wealth tax compared with other taxes, the arguments for and against a wealth tax, and opinions on the particular design of such a tax. Key findings include high levels of public support for a wealth tax compared with other taxes, and support for the base of the tax to include financial investments and property wealth (after excluding the main home). The most popular rate/threshold combination is for the tax to be levied at a rate of at least 1 per cent over £500,000. Support for the tax appears to be driven by a combination of rational self-interest and beliefs about fairness but, in particular, the public are keen for the tax to be focused on those with capacity to contribute the most.


IMPUESTO SOBRE EL PATRIMONIO
RIQUEZA
RENTAS ALTAS
IMPUESTOS
OPINION PUBLICA
CAPACIDAD CONTRIBUTIVA
REINO UNIDO
ENCUESTAS


Sood, Amrita
Tu, Trinh

Fiscal Studies 0143-5671 [papel] v. 42, issue 3-4, September-December 2021, p. 431-455

Powered by Koha