Grodem, Anne Skevik
Networking, lobbying and bargaining for pension trade union power in the Norwegian pension reform / Anne Skevik Grodem and Jon M. Hippe .-- , 2019
Disponible también en formato electrónico en la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
Norway reformed its pension system in 2011, introducing a Swedish-style, NDC system. Contrary to expectations, the reform was largely supported by the dominant confederation
of trade unions, the LO. In this article, we look at LO involvement in the process at different stages. Through qualitative interviews with key reform architects, we have traced the process between 2005 and 2008, emphasising actors, meeting places and interests. Starting from the insight that unions can influence through lobbying, bargaining and (the threat of) mobilising, we suggest that lobbying can be a mutual process, where parties and unions move each other’s positions. In addition, bargaining can take the form of behind-the-scenes cooperation, as well as of negotiations in the classic, Nordic-style industrial relations sense. Expanding on this framework, we suggest that the literature on pension reforms should pay more attention to negotiated and voluntary labour market occupational schemes, and to the importance of expertise and networks.
PENSIONES
REFORMA
SINDICATOS
NEGOCIACION
NORUEGA
Hippe, Jon M.
Journal of Public Policy 0143-814X v. 39, issue 3, September 2019, p. 465-481
Networking, lobbying and bargaining for pension trade union power in the Norwegian pension reform / Anne Skevik Grodem and Jon M. Hippe .-- , 2019
Disponible también en formato electrónico en la Biblioteca del IEF.
Resumen.
Bibliografía.
Norway reformed its pension system in 2011, introducing a Swedish-style, NDC system. Contrary to expectations, the reform was largely supported by the dominant confederation
of trade unions, the LO. In this article, we look at LO involvement in the process at different stages. Through qualitative interviews with key reform architects, we have traced the process between 2005 and 2008, emphasising actors, meeting places and interests. Starting from the insight that unions can influence through lobbying, bargaining and (the threat of) mobilising, we suggest that lobbying can be a mutual process, where parties and unions move each other’s positions. In addition, bargaining can take the form of behind-the-scenes cooperation, as well as of negotiations in the classic, Nordic-style industrial relations sense. Expanding on this framework, we suggest that the literature on pension reforms should pay more attention to negotiated and voluntary labour market occupational schemes, and to the importance of expertise and networks.
PENSIONES
REFORMA
SINDICATOS
NEGOCIACION
NORUEGA
Hippe, Jon M.
Journal of Public Policy 0143-814X v. 39, issue 3, September 2019, p. 465-481