000 | 01858nab#a2200313#c#4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | IEF | ||
005 | 20190816110849.0 | ||
008 | 170517s2017 NLD|| #####0 b|ENG|u | ||
040 | _aIEF | ||
041 | _aENG | ||
100 | 1 |
_aCordewener, Axel _922221 |
|
245 |
_aAnti - abuse measures in the area of direct taxation _b towards converging standards under treaty freedoms and EU Directives ? _c Axel Cordewener |
||
260 | _c2017 | ||
500 | _aDisponible también en línea a través de la Biblioteca del Instituto de Estudios Fiscales. Resumen. Conclusión. | ||
650 | 4 |
_aIMPUESTOS DIRECTOS _946526 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aABUSO DEL DERECHO _954389 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aEVASION FISCAL _944029 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aEROSIÓN DE LA BASE IMPONIBLE Y TRASLADO DE BENEFICIOS _963148 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aPREVENCIÓN _954712 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aTRIBUNAL DE JUSTICIA DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS _948611 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aJURISPRUDENCIA _947570 |
|
520 | _aIn recent years the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has developed a doctrine concerning the abuse of law in the area ofdirect taxation, providing Member States with a (rough) framework of criteria they have to take into account when applying domestic anti-abuse measures. The cornerstones of this doctrine have been shaped within the sphere of the fundamental freedoms of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and the CJEU is now asked to apply this doctrine also with respect to domestic anti-Directive shopping rules. A coherent approach by the Court in this area will be of importance for the interpretation of current harmonization measures (in particular, the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive). | ||
650 | 4 |
_943410 _aELUSION FISCAL |
|
650 | 4 |
_942805 _aLEGISLACION COMUNITARIA |
|
773 | 0 |
_tEC Tax Review _w124968 _gv. 26, n. 2, April 2017, p. 60-66 |
|
942 | _cART | ||
942 | _z147945 | ||
999 |
_c95845 _d95845 |