000			01380nab a2200205 c 4500
999			_c150220 _d150220
003			ES-MaIEF
005			20250206112536.0
007			ta
008			250206t2024 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0eng d
040			_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF
100	1		_972275 _aOprea, Ryan _d1977-
245	1	0	_aDecisions under risk are decisions under complexity _c Ryan Oprea
504			_aBibliografía.
520			_aWe provide evidence that classic lottery anomalies like probability weighting and loss aversion are not special phenomena of risk. They also arise (and often with equal strength) when subjects evaluate deterministic, positive monetary payments that have been disaggregated to resemble lotteries. Thus, we find, e.g., apparent probability weighting in settings without probabilities and loss aversion in settings without scope for loss. Across subjects, anomalies in these deterministic tasks strongly predict the same anomalies in lotteries. These findings suggest that much of the behavior motivating our most important behavioral theories of risk derive from complexity-driven mistakes rather than true risk preferences.
650		4	_947655 _aLOTERIA
650		4	_950228 _aPROBABILIDADES
650		4	_948576 _aTOMA DE DECISIONES
773	0		_9172855 _oOP 234/2024/12 _tThe American Economic Review _w(IEF)103372 _x 0002-8282 _g v. 114, n.12, December 2024, p. 3789-3811.
942			_cART