000 01421nab a2200205 c 4500
999 _c150104
_d150104
003 ES-MaIEF
005 20241217174615.0
007 ta
008 241212s2024 us ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
040 _aES-MaIEF
_beng
_cES-MaIEF
100 _968041
_aSingh, Kartikeya
245 1 0 _aBehavioral incentives under amount A
_blaw of unintended consequences redux
_c by Kartikeya Singh
260 _c2024
520 _aKartikeya Singh is a principal in the transfer pricing practice of PwC’s Washington National Tax Services. He thanks Stewart Brant, Peter Merrill, W. Joe Murphy, and Pat Brown for their review and comments In this article, Singh uses a hypothetical example to explain how behavioral incentives created by pillar 1 amount A rules could influence in-scope companies to relocate personnel and physical capital away from headquarter jurisdictions to low-tax investment hubs. The views expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of PwC. All errors and views are those of the author and should not be ascribed to PwC or any other person.
650 4 _971719
_aAMOUNT A (PRIMER PILAR, OCDE)
650 4 _948608
_aTRATADOS INTERNACIONALES
650 4 _947856
_aORGANIZACION DE COOPERACION Y DESARROLLO ECONOMICO
773 0 _9172619
_oOP 138-Bis/2024/115/10
_tTax Notes International
_w(IEF)124525
_x 1048-3306
_g v. 115, n. 10, September 2 2024, p. 1469-1486
942 _cART