000			01626nab a2200265 c 4500
999			_c149257 _d149257
003			ES-MaIEF
005			20240415175145.0
007			ta
008			240415t2023 ne ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040			_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF
100	1		_967775 _aLammers, Jeroen
245		4	_aThe EU solidarity contribution and a more proportional alternative _helectrónico _ba study under EU and international investment law _c Jeroen Lammers & Blazej Kuzniacki
500			_aResumen.
520			_aThis paper reviews the EU Solidarity Contribution that was introduced by the Council Regulation on Emergency Intervention to Address High Energy Prices and proposes a more proportional alternative. It is argued that the legitimacy of the EU Solidarity Contribution might be disputed. The role that Member States have played in driving up energy prices by filling their natural gas storages much more than the EU’s filling trajectory prescribes raises questions as to whether the EU Solidarity Contribution could be in conflict with the proportionality principle and whether all formal requirements of Article 122(1) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) have been fulfilled.
650		4	_943612 _aENERGIA
650		4	_933525 _aCARBURANTES
650		4	_aPRECIOS _948092
650		4	_948501 _aSUBVENCIONES PUBLICAS
650		4	_947531 _aINVERSIONES
650		4	_aFISCALIDAD INTERNACIONAL _944303
650		4	_970374 _aBENEFICIOS EXTRAORDINARIOS
700			_963454 _aKuzniacki, Blazej
773	0		_9171451 _oOP 2141/2023/6/7 _tIntertax _w(IEF)55619 _x 0165-2826 _g v. 51, Issue 6/7, June 2023, p. 451-471
942			_cRE