000			01743nab a2200205 c 4500
999			_c149247 _d149247
003			ES-MaIEF
005			20240415131006.0
007			ta
008			240415t2023 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|spa d
040			_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF
100	1		_971630 _aHeyerdahl, Anne
245		0	_aStandardising policy in a nonstandard way _ba public/private standardisation process in Norway _c Anne Heyerdahl
500			_aResumen
504			_aBibliografía.
520			_aStandards developed by standard-setting organisations (SSOs) – sometimes labelled private rulemaking – are part of larger practices of governance in most societies yet are underinvestigated from a policy process perspective. Utilising and developing the multiple streams approach (MSA), this article investigates a policy process moving between government and the SSO Standards Norway (SN). The study finds standardisation by SSOs to be an ambiguous institutional arrangement. Strong institutional barriers in theory did not work as such in the case investigated. This article argues that the differentiation between responsibility for process (SN) and content (committee) makes the standardisation process vulnerable. The concept of “institutional deficit” is introduced to describe a potential mismatch between SSOs producing policy in a government-like institution, but where the SSOs are not capable of taking responsibility for policies in a government-like way. This article finds the adjusted MSA useful in this potentially least likely case.
650		4	_948072 _aPOLITICAS PUBLICAS
650		4	_947838 _aNORMALIZACION
773	0		_9171579 _oOP 1793/2023/4 _tJournal of Public Policy _w(IEF)17584 _x 0143-814X _g v. 43, issue 4, December 2023, p. 761-790
942			_cART