000			01583nab a2200217 c 4500
999			_c148485 _d148485
003			ES-MaIEF
005			20231120125316.0
007			ta
008			231120t2023 uk ||||| |||| 00| |eng d
040			_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF
100			_950778 _aFernandes, Reynaldo
245		0	_aPublic policies and social progress _btwo evaluation models _c Reynaldo Fernandes
500			_aResumen.
504			_aBibliografía.
520			_aThe article presents two models of public policy evaluation: one named idealistic and the other named pragmatic. In the former, social progress occurs when changes in the form of how society is organised bring us closer to social institutions and public authority conduct considered ideal. In the latter, social progress occurs if the prevailing social state (postchanges) is taken to be better than the previous social state (prechanges), according to certain pre-established judgement criteria. It is argued that the adoption of different models is one of the main obstacles to clarity in the public debate on the implementation of public policies, namely, that of making the points of disagreement explicit. The article presents a defence of the pragmatic model, which is considered more compatible with the use of scientific criteria in order to assess the effectiveness of policies.
650		4	_948072 _aPOLITICAS PUBLICAS
650		4	_942574 _aDESARROLLO SOCIAL
650			_aEVALUACION _944020
773	0		_9170626 _oOP 1793/2023/2 _tJournal of Public Policy _w(IEF)17584 _x 0143-814X _g v. 43, issue 2, June 2023, p. 199-214
942			_cART