000			02067nab a2200265 c 4500
999			_c148302 _d148302
003			ES-MaIEF
005			20240524104625.0
007			ta
008			231009t2023 us ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040			_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF
100	1		_971057 _aParlevliet, Jante
245		0	_aPopulist attitudes, fiscal illusion and fiscal preferences _bevidence from Dutch households _c Jante Parlevliet, Massimo Giuliodori, Matthijs Rooduijn
500			_aResumen.
504			_aBibliografía.
520			_aIt is well documented that the public is often poorly informed about the economy. In the domain of fiscal policy, this may make voters susceptible to favour spending, while underestimating its costs (fiscal illusion). While politicians may have more information to judge the need for prudent economic policies, voters may be less inclined to support prudent fiscal policy if they do not believe that these politicians act in their best interest—an idea that in recent decades has become more prevalent. Using a novel dataset from the Netherlands, this paper examines whether strong populist ideas lead to more expansionary fiscal preferences, thereby reinforcing the risk of fiscal illusion. The findings indicate that respondents' populist attitudes significantly predict their fiscal preferences. Additionally, higher literacy and information provision contribute to more prudent fiscal preferences. However, the impact of literacy is conditioned by the level of populist sentiment. Poorly literate respondents show higher support for tax relief only when holding strong populist attitudes, not when expressing lower levels of populist sentiment.
650			_aPOLITICA FISCAL _948067
650			_aOPINION PUBLICA _947876
650		4	_aILUSION FISCAL _945531
650		7	_aPOPULISMO _967114
650		4	_aPAISES BAJOS _943712
700			_952304 _aGiuliodori, Massimo
700	1		_971059 _aRooduijn, Matthijs
773	0		_9169944 _oOP 1443/2023/196/1/2 _tPublic Choice _w(IEF)124378 _x 0048-5829 _g v. 197, n. 1-2, October 2023, p. 201-225
942			_cART