000			01927nab a2200265 c 4500
999			_c147799 _d147799
003			ES-MaIEF
005			20230630130012.0
007			ta
008			230630t2022 uk ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d
040			_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF
100	1		_970804 _aBremer, Björn
245		0	_aFiscal policy preferences, trade-offs, and support for social investment _cBjörn Bremer and Marius R. Busemeyer
500			_aResumen.
504			_aBibliografía.
520			_aA common finding in the literature is that social investment policies are broadly popular among citizens but still politically difficult to implement. This article provides a partial answer to this puzzle by exploring the fiscal trade-offs associated with such a recalibration. Based on survey data from eight Western European countries, it first explores citizens’ fiscal policy preferences with regard to the preferred size of the public sector and the distribution of spending across different subsectors. These preferences are then shown to be significantly associated with attitudes towards fiscal trade-offs regarding the expansion of social investment policies. The results reveal a political dilemma for policy-makers keen on expanding social investment: People who traditionally support a large public sector and more welfare state spending tend to oppose redistributing spending towards social investment, whereas support for such a recalibration is higher among those who have a sceptical view on public spending.
650			_aPOLITICA FISCAL _948067
650		4	_947876 _aOPINION PUBLICA
650			_aINVERSIONES EMPRESARIALES _943879
650		4	_933421 _aBIENESTAR SOCIAL
650		4	_943749 _aESTADO DEL BIENESTAR
650		4	_944934 _aGASTOS SOCIALES
700	1		_970805 _aBusemeyer, Marius R.
773	0		_9169738 _oOP 1793/2022/4 _tJournal of Public Policy _w(IEF)17584 _x 0143-814X _g v. 42, n. 4, December 2022, p.684-704
942			_cART