000 | 01797nab a2200253 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
999 |
_c147042 _d147042 |
||
003 | ES-MaIEF | ||
005 | 20230207110333.0 | ||
007 | ta | ||
008 | 230203t2022 gw ||||| |||| 00| 0|eng d | ||
040 |
_aES-MaIEF _bspa _cES-MaIEF |
||
100 |
_957279 _aAn, Zhiyong |
||
245 | 0 |
_aSocial versus individual work preferences _bimplications for optimal income taxation _c Zhiyong An and David Coady |
|
500 | _aResumen. | ||
504 | _aBibliografía. | ||
520 | _aThe benchmark optimal income taxation model of Mirrlees (1971) finds that the optimal marginal income tax rate (MIT) is always non-negative. This paper extends the benchmark model to allow for differences in social and individual work preferences while maintaining its assumption that individuals are rational. The theoretical and simulation analyses show that under this model, when the government places a higher social weight on work than individuals, the optimal MIT schedule is shifted downwards, introducing the possibility for optimal wage subsidies at the bottom of the income distribution. This implies lower revenues, demogrants and overall progressivity. The case for wage subsidies is reinforced when the government places a relatively higher weight on work for low earners. The model also allows for an analysis of the optimal income tax schedule when government places a social value on unpaid non-market work as argued by Atkinson (2009, 2015). | ||
650 | 4 |
_aPRESTACIONES SOCIALES _948107 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aRENDIMIENTOS DE TRABAJO _948256 |
|
650 |
_aIMPUESTOS _947460 |
||
650 | 4 |
_aIMPOSICION OPTIMA _97978 |
|
650 | 4 |
_aMODELOS DE SIMULACIÓN _947773 |
|
700 | 1 |
_970354 _aCoady, Coady |
|
773 | 0 |
_9168722 _oOP 207/2022/4 _tFinanzArchiv _w(IEF)21244 _x 0015-2218 _g v. 78, n. 4, December 2022, p. 393-421 |
|
942 | _cART |